The enforced practice of zero waste to minimalism

Joyuseoto57

The latter, for example, is dominated by fear of scarcity, fear of loss of stability and the pursuit of petty bourgeois luxury from friendly republics such as floor lamps from Yugoslavia, walls from Romania and pottery from Czechoslovakia. With the appearance of Zero in Russia, they began to talk about exemplary luxury among the wealthy. But ordinary residents are also trying to buy new things, keeping old cell phones, boots and clothes that are already out of date. The same Komsomolskaya Pravda that now sings about rubber boots wrote in Soviet times that wanting jeans is immoral, materialistic, mining, etc.
  
So, in my opinion, the sense of well-being that befalls us in the ages is therapeutic. Psychologists say in moible number data interviews that this part of us comes out of the ghetto with at least a little bit of, damn it, dressed to walk. Meanwhile, old people prepare pickles for winter, and housewives try to give a second life to things like plastic bags or cans (in the age of coronavirus, the latter emerges as disposable medical masks.



Consumers are trying to go to the store with a rag bag in both today and age, and instead of throwing away their clothes, they repair or give them away. But if it's the people who reflect now because of their ecological footprint, they did it in the past to save money. I wouldn't compare . Quite the opposite. Obsessive partying leads to excess of everyday life. In this case, the practice of reuse is directly related to shortages and savings, argues. Crisis Changes Rules A Serious Blow to Rent, Rent Principles Don’t buy and throw away everything you don’t need is what the coronavirus has caused, or rather the quarantine.